whats different

[pipsmyman]

If youve read the books like me you would of noticed that there alot of changes some are big and some are small.
But I would have to say that the most dissapionting change would have to be a small one in the third movie. In the movie just after shelob attacks frodo and the orcs take him to the tower and the fight over all his gear and stuff. Well in the book frodos actually naked, and I was seriuosly looking forward to see elijah wood naked.
I am sure elijah would have gone naked after all he was getting paid heaps and hes read the books and there is no way he could of missed frodo being naked and when he signed the contract he would of known, damns you peter jackson for not putting it in

[LOTRox]

yeh, i haven't read all of the book, but i have started it, and everyone e\who has read it said that it is way different and better ib th book then in the movie. I suppose that's like the case for all of the movies that were books first- the original is always the best!!! like the harry potter books!!!-i mean, i'm not talking abiut harry potter on a Lord of the Rings site!!!anyways, i get your jist and point bridie!!!hehehe!!! ;D

[pipsmyman]

point...? I just wanted to see elijah NAKED

[pipsmyman]

But no seriously they left out Tom Bombadil and the old forest, and they put elves at Helms Deep and they even made Haldir die! And they left out my favourite chapter at the end of the third movie, I mean how could they!

[ilovedom]

well you cant have everything... i betr f they did it another way you would complain too.... im sooo glad it didnt end out corny... it was so sad though

[pipsmyman]

yeh coz they probaly could of ended it happy. I suppose they couldnt put everything in the film, they did a great job and im so glad peter jackson and stuff did it or else it would of been different and bad...lol.